Elite Colleges Face Uproar Over Giving Legacy Students a Major Admissions Edge

While many Americans believe college admissions are based primarily on merit, the practice of legacy admissions continues to shape who gets accepted at the nation's most selective institutions. Nearly one-third of selective four-year colleges consider legacy status when evaluating applicants. 

This preference is particularly prevalent at private institutions, where 42% use legacy preferences compared to just 15% of public colleges. These policies are especially concentrated in the Northeast, where many elite universities have century-old traditions of favoring the children of alumni. Legacy admissions originated in the 1920s at Ivy League colleges as a deliberate strategy to limit Jewish immigrants from gaining admission. The holistic review process employed by elite institutions allows legacy status to carry significant weight alongside other factors in admissions decisions.

Legacy preferences remain deeply intertwined with institutional fundraising strategies. Colleges openly acknowledge that legacy admissions help maintain strong relationships with alumni, who provide vital financial support through donations. You'll find that legacy students are often less likely to need financial aid and their parents tend to be more generous donors. This financial motivation explains why many institutions resist abandoning the practice despite mounting criticism. When alumni see their children benefit from their connection to the school, they're more inclined to maintain financial ties. 

A 2005 analysis showed that legacy status increased an applicant's chances of admission by 19.7 percentage points within the same SAT score range. In today's climate of record-low acceptance rates at elite universities, this advantage becomes even more significant. A growing number of institutions, including MIT, have taken a stand by completely eliminating legacy considerations from their admissions processes.

The numbers tell a striking story about the advantage legacy status confers. At Ivy League institutions, legacies make up 10% to 15% of each entering class, with admission rates two to five times higher than non-legacy applicants. Harvard's 33% acceptance rate for legacies between 2014 and 2019 stood in stark contrast to its overall admission rate of roughly 6%. These disparities have fueled intense debate about fairness in college admissions.

Critics point to the demographic implications of legacy policies. Legacy students are disproportionately white and affluent, reinforcing existing inequities in higher education. Schools with legacy policies enroll fewer Black and Hispanic students and serve smaller percentages of low-income students receiving Pell Grants. First-generation college students find themselves at a structural disadvantage in a system that rewards family educational history. This disadvantage is particularly pronounced for first-generation students, with research showing only 30% view parents as key resources during the application process.

Despite the controversy, many institutions defend legacy admissions by pointing to data suggesting these students perform well academically once enrolled. However, research presents a mixed picture, with some studies indicating legacy admits earn lower average grades than their peers with similar credentials.

As scrutiny intensifies, more institutions are reevaluating their approaches to legacy admissions. You'll likely see this debate continue to evolve as colleges balance traditions, financial considerations, and growing demands for more equitable pathways to higher education.

Do you need help with the College Application Process?

Sign up for one of our live Zoom workshops. We can help make the application process easier!